Comments on: Would You Buy a 4-Cylinder Camaro, Challenger or Mustang? http://www.carversation.com/2008/03/21/would-you-buy-a-4-cylinder-camaro-challenger-or-mustang/ Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:44:09 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: 8 http://www.carversation.com/2008/03/21/would-you-buy-a-4-cylinder-camaro-challenger-or-mustang/#comment-4021 8 Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:40:42 +0000 http://www.carversation.com/2008/03/21/would-you-buy-a-4-cylinder-camaro-challenger-or-mustang/#comment-4021 American 4 cylinders are terrible. Only a few cars with 4 cylinders are good (Lotus Exige, Lotus Elise, S2000) and none of them are American cars. American 4 cylinders are terrible. Only a few cars with 4 cylinders are good (Lotus Exige, Lotus Elise, S2000) and none of them are American cars.

]]> By: Erik Zann http://www.carversation.com/2008/03/21/would-you-buy-a-4-cylinder-camaro-challenger-or-mustang/#comment-3908 Erik Zann Sat, 01 Nov 2008 00:09:55 +0000 http://www.carversation.com/2008/03/21/would-you-buy-a-4-cylinder-camaro-challenger-or-mustang/#comment-3908 I wouldn't mind buying a 4 banger muscle car as long as it has some power. Most 4 cylinders are dogs, plus they don't really have much muscular sound to them. If gas gets any more expensive I might have to buy one. I wouldn’t mind buying a 4 banger muscle car as long as it has some power. Most 4 cylinders are dogs, plus they don’t really have much muscular sound to them. If gas gets any more expensive I might have to buy one.

]]> By: Albert http://www.carversation.com/2008/03/21/would-you-buy-a-4-cylinder-camaro-challenger-or-mustang/#comment-87 Albert Fri, 09 May 2008 07:06:01 +0000 http://www.carversation.com/2008/03/21/would-you-buy-a-4-cylinder-camaro-challenger-or-mustang/#comment-87 I used to own an 85 Ford Thunderbird Turbo Coupe which had a turbo 4. It worked perfectly well with a 4 and got 30+ mpg on the highway. With it's 20 gallon tank, it could go over 500 miles per tank. It was reasonably quick as well - even though it had just 150 HP. Honestly on public roads 260 HP is more than enough. With gas prices this high, I think it's essential that Ford, GM, and Chrysler introduce 4 cylinder engines whenever feasible. I used to own an 85 Ford Thunderbird Turbo Coupe which had a turbo 4. It worked perfectly well with a 4 and got 30+ mpg on the highway. With it’s 20 gallon tank, it could go over 500 miles per tank. It was reasonably quick as well - even though it had just 150 HP.

Honestly on public roads 260 HP is more than enough.

With gas prices this high, I think it’s essential that Ford, GM, and Chrysler introduce 4 cylinder engines whenever feasible.

]]>