Comments on: Would You Buy a 4-Cylinder Camaro, Challenger or Mustang?

By: Sadiq

Sadiq — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:24:18 +0000

Hell yea 4 cylinder iz de best option ….. watz de logic of havin 4.0 V8 mustang producin 300hp wen i cn get a GTR R-34 2.5 V4 producin 290 plus or EVO producin 290 wid 2.0 V4 engine? wid hikin fuel prices itz def. V4 engines must b bought 2 muscles evn

By: revolver

revolver — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:51:02 +0000

I think in these days it’s better to buy 4-cylinders car but not with muscle cars

such as mustang , camaro and challenger

By: Javier

Javier — Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:34:57 +0000

xUrBamNosQu0h

By: 8

Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:40:42 +0000

American 4 cylinders are terrible. Only a few cars with 4 cylinders are good (Lotus Exige, Lotus Elise, S2000) and none of them are American cars.

By: Erik Zann

Erik Zann — Sat, 01 Nov 2008 02:09:55 +0000

I wouldn’t mind buying a 4 banger muscle car as long as it has some power. Most 4 cylinders are dogs, plus they don’t really have much muscular sound to them. If gas gets any more expensive I might have to buy one.

By: Albert

Albert — Fri, 09 May 2008 07:06:01 +0000

I used to own an 85 Ford Thunderbird Turbo Coupe which had a turbo 4. It worked perfectly well with a 4 and got 30+ mpg on the highway. With it’s 20 gallon tank, it could go over 500 miles per tank. It was reasonably quick as well – even though it had just 150 HP.

Honestly on public roads 260 HP is more than enough.

With gas prices this high, I think it’s essential that Ford, GM, and Chrysler introduce 4 cylinder engines whenever feasible.