<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Honda Confirms New NSX for 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carversation.com/2007/12/20/honda-confirms-new-nsx-for-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carversation.com/2007/12/20/honda-confirms-new-nsx-for-2010/</link>
	<description>Let&#039;s start a CarVersation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 15:56:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rootninja</title>
		<link>http://www.carversation.com/2007/12/20/honda-confirms-new-nsx-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-7561</link>
		<dc:creator>rootninja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carversation.com/?p=230#comment-7561</guid>
		<description>The only thing wrong with the old nsx was that it came with a tape deck through the very last year they made it!  It will be a shame if the new nsx  powerplant isn&#039;t behind the driver.  I&#039;m a little biased.  I own a &#039;94 nsx and I love it.  I (and many others) will not be interested in a front engine nsx, ever. The 91-05 nsx&#039;s were very similar and the reason was simple: the design was ahead of its time and didn&#039;t need an update.  Hand built in limited production, all aluminum, etc. it was a fine exotic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing wrong with the old nsx was that it came with a tape deck through the very last year they made it!  It will be a shame if the new nsx  powerplant isn&#8217;t behind the driver.  I&#8217;m a little biased.  I own a &#8217;94 nsx and I love it.  I (and many others) will not be interested in a front engine nsx, ever. The 91-05 nsx&#8217;s were very similar and the reason was simple: the design was ahead of its time and didn&#8217;t need an update.  Hand built in limited production, all aluminum, etc. it was a fine exotic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a</title>
		<link>http://www.carversation.com/2007/12/20/honda-confirms-new-nsx-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-4020</link>
		<dc:creator>a</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 01:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carversation.com/?p=230#comment-4020</guid>
		<description>The old NSX changed a lot in about 2002-2003. It went from pop up lights to nonpop up lights as well as a few other minor changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old NSX changed a lot in about 2002-2003. It went from pop up lights to nonpop up lights as well as a few other minor changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reina</title>
		<link>http://www.carversation.com/2007/12/20/honda-confirms-new-nsx-for-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-3850</link>
		<dc:creator>Reina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://carversation.com/?p=230#comment-3850</guid>
		<description>Great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.544 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-01-14 06:10:24 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
